Author Archives: languageandgrammar

Back and Better than Ever

Posted on March 3, 2009 by languageandgrammar

You’re all probly as surprised as I am that I haven’t written a monthly review of errors in months (I followed some not-so-super advice). I can’t help but think about how many complements about the smarter blog that might have … Continue reading →

Posted in language | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Back and Better than Ever

Nip it WHERE????

Posted on March 2, 2009 by languageandgrammar

No matter how many times you’ve said it—and you know who you are—nip it in the butt is NOT the correct phrase. Nip it in the butt? Ouch! If you must use this cliche, then use it properly: Nip it … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, language, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nip it WHERE????

Scratch and Dent Sale

Posted on February 27, 2009 by languageandgrammar

Language and marketing are inseparable since the key to effective marketing is effective communication, and with that in mind, I’d like to mention that I’m troubled by the frequency of scratch and dent sales that take place at a local … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, humor, language | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Scratch and Dent Sale

Symbols of Patriotism, Obama Address to Congress

Posted on February 26, 2009 by languageandgrammar

With all due respect to EF Hutton, when President Obama speaks, people listen–well, most people. I didn’t listen to the entire Obama address to Congress; however, I heard an important part of the speech–one that made a fascinating statement about … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, language, politics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Symbols of Patriotism, Obama Address to Congress

THAT’S Incredible; I’M Incredulous.

Posted on February 24, 2009 by languageandgrammar

I’ve heard the word incredulous attributed to situations, as in That’s an incredulous story. The problem is that incredulous means skeptical or disbelieving, which is a human trait, not something that can be attributed to an inanimate object, a theory, … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, language, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on THAT’S Incredible; I’M Incredulous.

Look Mom, Hands Free

Posted on February 23, 2009 by languageandgrammar

One of the terms that I wrote about in Literally, the Best Language Book Ever was our use of -friendly. We use the same construction, pairing a word with -friendly, in ways that are inconsistent, which leads to understandable confusion. … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, language, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Political Pundits

Posted on February 17, 2009 by languageandgrammar

Being a political pundit must be a great job. That has to be the case with being able to provide opinion, mainly critical, without having the responsibility to do any better—especially when it’s done on national television or in a … Continue reading →

Posted in language, politics, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Political Pundits

More Than an Upgrade Needed

Posted on February 13, 2009 by languageandgrammar

Although not everyone will agree with us, we at languageandgrammar.com believe that language subtlety is important. Thoughts are precise, and a lack of subtlety in language usage is often a reflection of a lack of sharpness of thought. That brings … Continue reading →

Posted in language, writing | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on More Than an Upgrade Needed

Road to Hoe

Posted on February 10, 2009 by languageandgrammar

If there is anything worse than using a cliche, it’s trying to use a cliche and getting it wrong. You would think we wouldn’t get something wrong that’s been repeated so often! I like to call these instances Close but … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, language, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Subordinating Conjunctions

Posted on February 9, 2009 by languageandgrammar

While coordinating conjunctions (and, but, for, nor, or, so, yet), which connect clauses of equal importance, get a great deal of press in every grammar book, they’re not the only conjunctions in town. Subordinating conjunctions connect clauses as well, but … Continue reading →

Posted in grammar, writing | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Subordinating Conjunctions